SHARED DECK
01 Meta ARASAKA Aggro v3
Value · 48 cards · grade D
From CHOOMDECK · imported list
✎ Edit this description · ⤓ Share image this is your deck
| Curve health | Consistency | Efficiency | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|
| 64 | 69 | 61 | 65 |
Scores are out of 100. When players have ranked results for the deck's three Legends, the overall is half how the deck is BUILT (curve, consistency, efficiency) and half RESULTS, how decks on those Legends do in ranked play; without results it is the build alone. Efficiency is anchored on real decks: 1.00 power per point of cost scores 50, and 1.40, the best any real deck reaches, scores 95. Most finished decks land in the 70s, so a C is an ordinary deck rather than a bad one.
CAN I BUILD IT?
Sign in and this deck shows which of its cards your Stash already has, what is missing, and what the rest costs.
Decklist
| Card | cost | type | color | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3x | 6th Street Recruits | 4 | Unit | Red |
| 2x | Arasaka Emergency Radioport | 2 | Gear | Red |
| 3x | Corporate Surveillance | 2 | Program | Green |
| 2x | Detonate | 1 | Program | Red |
| 3x | Emergency Atlus | 3 | Unit | Green |
| 3x | Field Operator | 3 | Unit | Green |
| 3x | Goro Takemura — Losing His Way | 4 | Unit | Green |
| 1x | Hanako Arasaka — Daughter of the Emperor | Legend | Green | |
| 3x | Industrial Assembly | 1 | Program | Red |
| 2x | Maelstrom Zealots | 4 | Unit | Green |
| 2x | Mantis Blades | 1 | Gear | Red |
| 2x | Meredith Stout — Stone Cold Corpo | 4 | Unit | Red |
| 1x | Minotaur | 7 | Unit | Red |
| 3x | Peace Offering | 1 | Program | Green |
| 1x | Saburo Arasaka — Stubborn Patriarch | Legend | Green | |
| 2x | Sandayu Oda — Hanako's Guardian | 7 | Unit | Green |
| 3x | Satori — Sword of Saburo | 2 | Gear | Red |
| 2x | Screw — Lovelorn Fool | 5 | Unit | Red |
| 2x | Synapse Burnout | 1 | Program | Green |
| 2x | Take Control | 2 | Program | Green |
| 2x | Wild in the Streets | 5 | Program | Green |
| 1x | Yorinobu Arasaka — Embracing Destruction | Legend | Red |
Side by side on every rated axis, plus a structural read of how the two builds interact. No winner is predicted — a rating measures construction, not a matchup.